Our Blog

CCE staff and partner reflections on our collaborative work to create schools where learning is engaging and rewarding, and every student is set up for success.

Put Us In the Room Where It Happens: Teacher-Driven Shifts To Mastery

I wanna be in the room where it happens.

This line from the Broadway hit Hamilton is one I refer to often when thinking about how we can effectively bring students and teachers in to create honest and equitable systems of assessment.

Our little school in Queens, New York, has worked tirelessly to create and maintain a teacher-created system of mastery-based grading. I’m thirteen years into my middle and high school English teaching career, but the school I have had the privilege of being a part of for the past six years is The Young Women’s Leadership School of Astoria. Our school is grades 6-12, public, all-girls, and Title I.  On average, 98% of our graduates are accepted to and attend college, and we have been a mastery-based school for the past seven years.

Kingham1

Christy conducting a coaching session. 

Our mastery work began when our founding principal shared a paper with her then-staff, “Removing Structural Barriers to Academic Achievement in High Schools: An Innovative Model” by Camille A. Farrington and Margaret H. Small.  The gist of the paper addressed the dropout rate as a “structural problem” connected to traditional systems of determining final grades and course credit. It was a call to action honoring “differential learning rates”. For our founding teachers, this was an issue of social justice-being able to provide multiple opportunities for students to achieve mastery of skills over time was simply more equitable. Our through line was, and remains, educational equity.  

Seven years ago, the school launched into an outcomes-based system with each teacher creating her own set of outcomes. After a few years of experimentation, we learned our students needed more consistency. Our principal gave us the time and space to come together from varying departments and grade-levels to create a more unified system. Just before the start of the 2013 school year, in a sweaty, chart-papered and post-it laden classroom, ten teachers hashed out a system of 21st century competencies, derived from Authentic Education’s work, that we would use to rate our student’s skills.   

Kingham2

Now, all students in all subjects are assessed on these 21st century skills: planning, collaborating,discerning, being precise, arguing, innovating, investigating, concluding, communicating, and creating. Once we had hashed out our larger buckets, we had some “Goldilocks years” until we finally settled on a system of ten to fifteen departmental outcome learning targets connected to these ten 21st century buckets.   

Kingham3

The key to our system’s success is that we had room to experiment and revise. We were trusted as educators to create a research-based, standards-aligned system that worked for our community. Then we were trusted to revise that system again and again until we found elements that worked.  Paid overtime hours were set aside to support our efforts. We have critical friends in other NYC-based mastery schools as a part of the DOE’s Mastery Collaborative. As we consider the implications of the “age of accountability” on our students and schools, as we search for ways to adapt to the new world of work our students find themselves in, why not fling open those doors to the room where it happens?

Featured

Blog Post

Guiding Students in Reflection: The Gateway Process at Parker

November 30, 2016
Practice in reflection helps students develop self-awareness. It also sends a message: yes we are giving you grades, but you should also understand yourself as a learner.
Blog Post

Bridging the Dewey-Freire Divide

December 22, 2016
There doesn’t need to be a chasm between deeper learning and critical pedagogy. In fact, there are plenty of opportunities for common ground.
Blog Post

In Search of a Better Accountability System

November 8, 2016
Through more than 20 years of No Child Left Behind, we have lived with a uniform definition of accountability, that of a standardized test used to make determinations of student learning and school and district progress. It is time to question some of the assumptions underlying this practice.
comments powered by Disqus